It’s a great reminder that it wasn’t as certain at the time, as we see it now. David McCullough makes the story compelling and insightful. Americans often forget just how uncertain the outcome was. It makes me appreciate the outcome more.
McCullough is also a writer who I can enjoy reading and who I can enjoy listening to when he reads his own books.
Great book mixing science, history and politics. The story goes back to understand the science (and the struggle to find the right path and understanding). It also helps you appreciate the way scientists work. It is a thick book, but very rewarding for its insights.
This was a major development in science, but Rhodes downplays it’s military importance. During the way it was speculation on how far along the various countries were in developing an atomic weapon. When the war ended it was clearer that the countries were much farther behind. Rhodes also writes about that time when only Japan is still fighting and the leaders in the U.S. are trying to decide how to bring the war to a quick end.
The atomic bond was terrible but so was the incendiary bombing in cities such as Dresden and Tokyo. Those bombings killed tens of thousands of people too. In the decisions of which cities might be bombed with an atomic bomb, those targets were chosen partially on cities that had not been bombed with incendiaries.
Rhodes book stop with the bombing of Nagasaki, but the book discusses how the scientists were already far along on the development of the thermonuclear bomb. The development of atomic weapons shows just how terrible the rise of Hitler and Nazism was viewed across the world. It was evil that must be stopped.
Because this book was so groundbreaking when it published and it has inspired others, it’s hard to appreciate it. The story is told in a powerful voice over a shocking crime by two people who also have an interesting back story. It doesn’t excuse what they did, but shows this crime was the result of bad information, misguided ideas and dreams. The murder of the Clutter forever changed many lives. One should read the book as based on a true story, since there have been questions about the license Capote took in improving the storytelling. Despite the reservations it is still a great book
The story moved too slowly for me, but it was still compelling enough to get to the end. I put it down for awhile, but was so close to the end, that it didn’t matter if I mixed up the characters at the end
Good overview of some risks modern armies face against today’s technology and cyberwar. I always appreciate a book that offers readers ways to learn more about the topics.
I’m more used to this genre thanks to Tom Clancy, so it’s harder to get as excited about a book following that path. But it does remind us that regardless of the technology, in the end it comes down to people, sometimes acting independently.
At the end of the book, I felt unsettled, because the threats so strongly identified in the book still exist today.
Good overview of some risks modern armies face against today’s technology and cyberwar. I always appreciate a book that offers readers ways to learn more about the topics.
I’m more used to this genre thanks to Tom Clancy, so it’s harder to get as excited about a book following that path. But it does remind us that regardless of the technology, in the end it comes down to people, sometimes acting independently.
At the end of the book, I felt unsettled, because the threats so strongly identified in the book still exist today
The story of what the Wright Brothers did in 1903 is well known, but McCullough tells more. Especially interesting was the time after their first flight. They did not build a huge corporation after their flight. Their actions show being first to market does not always guarantee success. Business is very different than solving the issues of powered flight.
Wonderful book. It makes me appreciate the talent of the movie makers more because they captured so much of the wonderful stuff and weren’t tempted by some of the minor stories in the book.
It’s eerie how this book’s tale feels as if it could happen so easily. A little nudge here or an overreaction there and you find yourself in this world. Readers should find strength in the book as it shows how easy it is to control others is to remove their ability to read. how on of the ways to control is to remove their ability to learn to read or remove the need to read.
Initially this sounds like a depressing book, but then you realize that humans are also the only group trying to do something. It’s yet to be seen if it can be successful.
Finished Atkins’s 3-book trilogy of World War II in Europe. I learned a lot more than I knew before and the narrative was interesting throughout the book. It’s still from a U.S./U.K. perspective. Great reading for someone who only studied the war in school.
This is a did not finish book for me. Just couldn’t stay focused on the book. The path of this book may have been too wandering for my interest at this time. I’m putting the book down, and I doubt I’ll return.
It’s set in a fascinating time to me — the days before and just after Hitler took power. This was Kerr’s first book in this series and I’m looking forward to reading more of his books to get a sense of what it was like to live in Germany during that time.
Medical examiners are portrayed as big crime solvers in TVs and movies, but Judy Melinek shows that it’s a lot of routine work with an occasional insight, but few dramatic breakthroughs.
The book was interesting in the intersection of routine life, such as taking the children to the park, in the afternoon after a doing an autopsy after some grisly death.
Melinek also recounts what it was like working in the NY medical examiners office in the months after then 9-11 tragedy and how the suicide of her father impacted her
This is a detailed look at America’s role against the Gernmany and Italy in World War II. This phase looks at the some of the tensions between the United States and U.K., and also looks at how important this phase of the war was even though it’s importance fades after D-Day. But which phase of the war isn’t critical to the other?
“Toms River” is frustrating because it shows how slow it takes to determine if there is a problem and the delays in implementing a solution. Fifty years my be a short time for new scientific research, but it’s a lifetime for people impacted and the businesses that could be held accountable.
Masterman gave me different views of characters and place, which is one reason I chose it. It had some rough edges, but still enjoyable. This one is set in Arizona and the main character is a former FBI agent, in her late 50s.
“Capital” is a very long-term look at wealth that argues that wealth is becoming more concentrated, contradicting the common outlook.
The book looks at the situation in several countries, and reaches the same consequence. Hi recommendation of a one-time tax to redistribute wealth is not likely to be enacted anytime soon.
A very different view of Helen Keller than from the movie “Miracle Worker”. Her life into college and later was also very interesting and the support of Anne Sullivan and others give a more enjoyable and broader view.
I enjoy Bill Bryson. The feel less like a book than sitting down for an evening of fascinating conversation. His stories about Lindbergh and New York theater in 1927 (the high-water mark before radio and talkies) were the best parts.
A good introduction to the issues of DRM. It helps you understand the issues, but I didn’t feel capable of deciding on new issues and this is an ever-changing frontier now. I am a big fan of Doctorow and enjoy his writings.